Developing Health Professional Capacity Through Community Partnership: Evaluation of an Inclusive Exercise Program for Adults with Physical Disability in Longford, Ireland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56147/jbhs.3.2.132Keywords:
- Physical disability,
- Community-based rehabilitation,
- Interprofessional education,
- Service evaluation,
- Exercise prescription,
- Partnership working
Abstract
Background: Adults with physical disability experience reduced access to structured physical activity and prolonged waiting times for rehabilitation services. Traditional one-to-one therapy models may not adequately address sustained physical activity needs while maintaining service quality and capacity. Community-integrated exercise pathways may offer a strategy to improve functional outcomes and alleviate system-level pressures.
Aim: To evaluate the functional and service-level impact of a community-based group exercise program implemented within an adult disability service.
Methods: A service evaluation was conducted of a community-based, group exercise program for adults with physical disability delivered in partnership between HSE adult disability services and community physical activity providers. Participants were referred through routine clinical pathways and screened for medical stability and suitability for group exercise. The intervention consisted of supervised exercise sessions delivered over an 8-week period. Outcome measures included the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5TSTS), Berg balance scale, gait speed (10-metre walk test), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and self-reported health (VAS). Pre- and post-program assessments were completed by trained staff. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize outcomes, with paired analyses conducted using t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests as appropriate. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) and percentage change were calculated. Clinical significance was interpreted using established Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) thresholds.
Results: The sample included 23 participants (14 female (60%), 9 male (40%) with a mean age of 51.3 years (SD=12.3), a median age of 55 years and an age range of 21-65 years. Participants demonstrated improvements in mobility, lower limb strength, balance and health-related quality of life, with a majority achieving clinically meaningful gains in gait speed and functional strength. At a service level, physiotherapy waiting list volume reduced by 93.9% (66-4 clients) and maximum waiting time decreased by 86.7% (30-4 weeks), indicating substantial improvement in service flow.
Conclusion: A community-based group exercise pathway embedded within an adult disability service achieved meaningful functional improvements while significantly reducing waiting list pressures. These findings suggest that redistributing appropriate signposting into structured community programs can enhance equity of access, preserve clinical capacity for complex cases and support sustainable service redesign.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization (2020) WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland.
Martin GKA, et al. (2019) Community-based physical activity interventions for adults with disabilities. J Phys Act Health 16: 221-229.
Rimmer JH, Rowland JL (2008) Health promotion for people with disabilities: Implications for empowering the person and promoting disability-friendly environments. Am J Lifestyle Med 2: 409-420.
Krahn GL, Walker DK, Correa-De-Araujo R (2015) Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. Am J Public Health 105: S198-S206.
Siciliani L, Borowitz M, Moran V (2013) Waiting time policies in the health sector: What works? OECD Publishing: Paris, France.
Ham C, Murray R (2015) Implementing the NHS five year forward view: Aligning policies with the plan. The King’s Fund: London, UK.
Rimmer JH, Lai B (2017) Framing new pathways in transformative exercise for people with disabilities. Disabil Health J 10: 1-2.
Greenhalgh T, et al. (2017) Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment and challenges to scale-up. J Med Internet Res 19: e367.
Frenk J, et al. (2010) Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 376: 1923-1958.
Bohannon RW (2006) Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test. J Strength Cond Res 20: 106-109.
Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK, Tiedemann A, Michaleff ZA, et al. (2019) Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1: CD012424.
Bohannon RW, Williams AA (2011) Normal walking speed: A descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 97: 182-189.
Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D (1989) Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 83: S7-S11.
EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16: 199-208.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2009) The IHI triple aim: Optimizing health, experience and cost. IHI: Boston, USA.
Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, USA.