Improving Articulation via AI‑Assisted Speech Practice in Children: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Authors

  • Shannan Conner Better Speech LLC, Online Speech Therapy Provider, Sanford, United States of America
  • Erin Kearney Better Speech LLC, Online Speech Therapy Provider, Sanford, United States of America
  • Jessica Norris Better Speech LLC, Online Speech Therapy Provider, Sanford, United States of America

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56147/jbhs.3.4.164

Keywords:

  • Online speech therapy,
  • Articulation disorders,
  • Pediatric speech therapy,
  • Telepractice,
  • /r/ sound errors,
  • /s/ sound errors

Abstract

Background: Speech sound disorders are common in childhood, particularly for later‑developing phonemes such as /s/ and /r/. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted speech practice tools may increase treatment intensity and provide structured home practice, but controlled evidence in teletherapy contexts remains limited.

Objective: To evaluate whether integrating an AI‑assisted speech practice tool with traditional teletherapy improves articulation accuracy of /s/ and /r/ sounds in children aged 6-17 years.

Methods: Twenty‑three participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either traditional teletherapy plus AI‑supported home practice (n=12) or traditional teletherapy alone (n=11). All participants completed eight clinician‑led teletherapy sessions. Articulation accuracy was assessed at baseline and post‑intervention using standardized word lists scored by licensed speech‑language pathologists.

Results: Participants receiving AI‑assisted practice demonstrated greater mean improvement (35.8%, SD 22.9) than those receiving teletherapy alone (27.5%, SD 22.4). The between‑group difference was 8.4% points (95% CI –11.3-28.1), t(21)=0.89, P=0.39. The effect size was moderate (Hedges g=0.36). The pilot was underpowered to detect statistical significance.

Conclusions: Although not statistically significant, the direction and magnitude of the effect suggest that AI‑assisted practice may enhance articulation outcomes when combined with teletherapy. Larger, prospectively registered trials with blinded scoring are warranted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wren Y, Miller LL, Peters TJ, Emond A, Roulstone S (2016) Prevalence and predictors of persistent speech sound disorder at eight years old: Findings from a population cohort study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 59: 647‑673.

Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C (2004) The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: A meta‑analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res 47: 924‑943.

Maas E, Robin DA, Austermann HSN, Freedman SE, Wulf G, et al. (2008) Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 17: 277‑298.

Wales D, Skinner L, Hayman M (2017) The efficacy of telehealth‑delivered speech and language intervention for primary school‑age children: A systematic review. Int J Telerehabil 9: 55‑70.

Hair A, Monroe P, Ahmed B, Ballard KJ, Gutierrez‑Osuna R (2018) Apraxia world: A speech therapy game for children with speech sound disorders. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children: 201‑219.

Benway NR, Preston JL, Hitchcock E, Rose Y, Salekin A, et al. (2023) Reproducible speech research with the artificial intelligence‑ready PERCEPT corpora. J Speech Lang Hear Res 66: 1986‑2009.

Furlong L, Erickson S, Morris ME (2017) Computer‑based speech therapy for childhood speech sound disorders. J Commun Disord 68: 50‑69.

Benway NR, Preston JL (2024) Artificial intelligence‑assisted speech therapy for /l/: A single‑case experimental study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 33: 2461‑2486.

Grogan‑Johnson S, Schmidt AM, Schenker J, Alvares R, Rowan LE, et al. (2013) A comparison of speech sound intervention delivered by tele-practice and side‑by‑side service delivery models. Commun Disord Q 34: 210‑220.

Williams AL (2012) Intensity in phonological intervention: is there a prescribed amount? Int J Speech Lang Pathol 14: 456‑461.

Preston JL, Hitchcock ER, Leece MC (2020) Auditory perception and ultrasound biofeedback treatment outcomes for children with residual /r/ distortions: A randomized controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res 63: 444‑455.

McAllister BT (2017) Efficacy of visual‑acoustic biofeedback intervention for residual rhotic errors: A single‑subject randomization study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 60: 1175‑1193.

Sugden E, Baker E, Munro N, Williams AL (2016) Involvement of parents in intervention for childhood speech sound disorders: A review of the evidence. Int J Lang Commun Disord 51: 597‑625.

Fagherazzi G, Goetzinger C, Rashid MA, Aguayo GA, Huiart L (2020) Digital health strategies to fight COVID‑19 worldwide: Challenges, recommendations and a call for papers. J Med Internet Res 22: e19284.

Preston JL, Leece MC, McNamara K, Maas E (2019) Intensive treatment with ultrasound visual feedback for speech sound errors in childhood apraxia. Front Hum Neurosci 13: 440.

Published

2026-10-08

How to Cite

Shannan Conner, Erin Kearney, & Jessica Norris. (2026). Improving Articulation via AI‑Assisted Speech Practice in Children: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Journal of Biology and Health Science. https://doi.org/10.56147/jbhs.3.4.164

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.